Mathematicsematical Physics

Download ACM-SIGDA Physical Design Workshop #5 1996: Proceedings by ACM-SIGDA PDF


Show description

Read Online or Download ACM-SIGDA Physical Design Workshop #5 1996: Proceedings PDF

Similar mathematicsematical physics books

Statistics for Nuclear and Particle Physicists

Written by means of a non-statistician for non-statisticians, the e-book emphasizes the sensible method of these difficulties in information that come up usually in facts research events in nuclear and excessive strength physics experiments. instead of pay attention to proofs and theorems, the writer presents an abundance of straightforward examples that illustrate the overall rules offered.

Additional info for ACM-SIGDA Physical Design Workshop #5 1996: Proceedings

Sample text

We have fU(X)f(_) = (3) fi(X)2 Proof: We first multiply Equation (1) by the denominator of its right hand side and then differentiating both side with respect to x. We get 2f(x)f'(r)(Rd + fr 1dt) T y = eCIC2 = ae where a > 0 and b > 0. (Note that b > 0 follows from the fact that f is decreasing. ) In order to determine a and b, we substitute f (r) = ae- bx into Equation (4) and check the two boundary points x - 0 and x = L. We obtain the following two equations: -2rof(x). = fJ0 f (t) Iny, + C2 = cobRda + roco(e cobRda + roco(e Since f(x) 0 0, we can divide both side by f(x) and get )a - rebCL - 1)a - - robCLe = 0, = 0.

Hence the total signal delay D = ,3=, Di. We represent the wire resistance (capacitance) of Q, by Ri (Ci). We have R2 = r and C2 = cody. The signal delay through the wire can be calculated as follows: roAx -T 3 f)f(t) f rx, lx X R d f( { Thus dD = coJ(Rd + ro f(t)dt) y2 By setting dD = 0, we get 2 We now consider unconstrained wire-sizing. We show that the optimal wire-sizing function satisfies a second order ordinary differential equation which can be analytically solved. - dt)- rO 5(CL + Co :+ Unconstrained Wire-Sizing ire J-21 10 ro(CL + co fag f(t)dt) co(Rd + rO jo+ 7 dt) ym-n gives minimum delay.

Section III will show an example for which no track permutations are possible, while track segment permutations lead to optimal results. In [10], track segment permutations in a switchbox are considered. In Section III, we show that even this method is sub-optimal because the initial route is not driven by coupled noise considerations. Besides, drive strengths are not considered and Section II will show that the coupled noise model is simplistic. The channel routing heuristic presented in [11] modifies a well-known channel router [14], [15] to reflect coupled noise issues.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.36 of 5 – based on 30 votes